12 KiB
- Introduction
- Problem 1 – Take a Dive
- Problem 2 – Another Step in the Proper Direction
- Problem 3 – Past Tasks Blast
- Problem 4 – Bioinformatics
- Problem 5 – Future and Present Value
- Problem 6 – Merge
- Problem 7 – UPC
- Problem 8 – Balancing the Scales
- Problem 9 – Upwardly Mobile
— title: "Dyalog APL Problem Solving Competition 2020 — Phase II" subtitle: "Annotated Solutions" date: 2020-08-02 toc: true —
Introduction
After Phase I, here are my solutions to Phase II problems. The full code is included in the post, but everything is also available on GitHub.
A PDF of the problems descriptions is available on the competition website, or directly from my GitHub repo.
The submission guidelines gave a template where everything is defined
in a Contest2020.Problems
Namespace. I kept the default values for
⎕IO
and ⎕ML
because the problems were not particularly easier with
⎕IO←0
.
:Namespace Contest2020
:Namespace Problems
(⎕IO ⎕ML ⎕WX)←1 1 3
This post is still a work in progress! I will try to write explanations for every problem below.
Problem 1 – Take a Dive
∇ score←dd DiveScore scores
:If 7=≢scores
scores←scores[¯2↓2↓⍋scores]
:ElseIf 5=≢scores
scores←scores[¯1↓1↓⍋scores]
:Else
scores←scores
:EndIf
score←2(⍎⍕)dd×+/scores
∇
This is a very straightforward implementation of the algorithm
describe in the problem description. I decided to switch explicitly on
the size of the input vector because I feel it is more natural. For
the cases with 5 or 7 judges, we use Drop (↓
) to remove the lowest
and highest scores.
At the end, we sum up the scores with +/
and multiply them by
dd
. The last operation, 2(⍎⍕)
, is a train using Format (Dyadic) to
round to 2 decimal places, and Execute to get actual numbers and not
strings.
Problem 2 – Another Step in the Proper Direction
∇ steps←{p}Steps fromTo;segments;width
width←|-/fromTo
:If 0=⎕NC'p' ⍝ No left argument: same as Problem 5 of Phase I
segments←0,⍳width
:ElseIf p<0 ⍝ -⌊p is the number of equally-sized steps to take
segments←(-⌊p){0,⍵×⍺÷⍨⍳⍺}width
:ElseIf p>0 ⍝ p is the step size
segments←p{⍵⌊⍺×0,⍳⌈⍵÷⍺}width
:ElseIf p=0 ⍝ As if we took zero step
segments←0
:EndIf
⍝ Take into account the start point and the direction.
steps←fromTo{(⊃⍺)+(-×-/⍺)×⍵}segments
∇
This is an extension to Problem 5 of Phase I. In each case, we compute the "segments", i.e., the steps starting from 0. In a last step, common to all cases, we add the correct starting point and correct the direction if need be.
To compute equally-sized steps, we first divide the segment $[0, 1]$
in p
equal segments with (⍳p)÷p
. This subdivision can then be
multiplied by the width to obtain the required segments.
When p
is the step size, we just divide the width by the step size
(rounded to the next largest integer) to get the required number of
segments. If the last segment is too large, we "crop" it to the width
with Minimum (⌊
).
Problem 3 – Past Tasks Blast
∇ urls←PastTasks url;r;paths
r←HttpCommand.Get url
paths←('[a-zA-Z0-9_/]+\.pdf'⎕S'&')r.Data
urls←('https://www.dyalog.com/'∘,)¨paths
∇
I decided to use HttpCommand
for this task, since it is simply one
]load HttpCommand
away and should be platform-independent.
Parsing XML is not something I consider "fun" in the best of cases,
and I feel like APL is not the best language to do this kind of
thing. Given how simple the task is, I just decided to find the
relevant bits with a regular expression using Replace and Search
(⎕S
).
After finding all the strings vaguely resembling a PDF file name (only
alphanumeric characters and underscores, with a .pdf
extension), I
just concatenate them to the base URL of the Dyalog domain.
Problem 4 – Bioinformatics
The first task can be solved by decomposing it into several functions.
⍝ Test if a DNA string is a reverse palindrome.
isrevp←{⍵≡⌽'TAGC'['ATCG'⍳⍵]}
First, we compute the complement of a DNA string (using simple
indexing) and test if its Reverse (⌽
) is equal to the original
string.
⍝ Generate all subarrays (position, length) pairs, for 4 ≤ length ≤ 12.
subarrays←{⊃,/(⍳⍵),¨¨3↓¨⍳¨12⌊1+⍵-⍳⍵}
We first compute all the possible lengths for each starting point. For instance, the last element cannot have any (position, length) pair associated to it, because there is no three element following it. So we crop the possible lengths to $[3, 12]$. For instance for an array of size 10:
{3↓¨⍳¨12⌊1+⍵-⍳⍵}10
┌──────────────┬───────────┬─────────┬───────┬─────┬───┬─┬┬┬┐
│4 5 6 7 8 9 10│4 5 6 7 8 9│4 5 6 7 8│4 5 6 7│4 5 6│4 5│4││││
└──────────────┴───────────┴─────────┴───────┴─────┴───┴─┴┴┴┘
Then, we just add the corresponding starting position to each length (1 for the first block, 2 for the second, and so on). Finally, we flatten everything.
∇ r←revp dna;positions
positions←subarrays⍴dna
⍝ Filter subarrays which are reverse palindromes.
r←↑({isrevp dna[¯1+⍵[1]+⍳⍵[2]]}¨positions)/positions
∇
For each possible (position, length) pair, we get the corresponding
DNA substring with dna[¯1+⍵[1]+⍳⍵[2]]
(adding ¯1
is necessary
because ⎕IO←1
). We test if this substring is a reverse palindrome
using isrevp
above. Replicate (/
) then selects only the (position,
length) pairs for which the substring is a reverse palindrome.
The second task is just about counting the number of subsets modulo 1,000,000. So we just need to compute $2^n \mod 1000000$ for any positive integer $n\leq1000$.
sset←{((1E6|2∘×)⍣⍵)1}
Since we cannot just compute $2^n$ directly and take the remainder, we
use modular arithmetic to stay mod 1,000,000 during the whole
computation. The dfn (1E6|2∘×)
doubles its argument mod
1,000,000. So we just apply this function $n$ times using the Power
operator (⍣
), with an initial value of 1.
Problem 5 – Future and Present Value
⍝ First solution: ((1+⊢)⊥⊣) computes the total return
⍝ for a vector of amounts ⍺ and a vector of rates
⍝ ⍵. It is applied to every prefix subarray of amounts
⍝ and rates to get all intermediate values. However,
⍝ this has quadratic complexity.
⍝ rr←(,\⊣)((1+⊢)⊥⊣)¨(,\⊢)
⍝ Second solution: We want to be able to use the
⍝ recurrence relation (recur) and scan through the
⍝ vectors of amounts and rates, accumulating the total
⍝ value at every time step. However, APL evaluation is
⍝ right-associative, so a simple Scan
⍝ (recur\amounts,¨values) would not give the correct
⍝ result, since recur is not associative and we need
⍝ to evaluate it left-to-right. (In any case, in this
⍝ case, Scan would have quadratic complexity, so would
⍝ not bring any benefit over the previous solution.)
⍝ What we need is something akin to Haskell's scanl
⍝ function, which would evaluate left to right in O(n)
⍝ time. This is what we do here, accumulating values
⍝ from left to right. (This is inspired from
⍝ dfns.ascan, although heavily simplified.)
rr←{recur←{⍵[1]+⍺×1+⍵[2]} ⋄ 1↓⌽⊃{(⊂(⊃⍵)recur⍺),⍵}/⌽⍺,¨⍵}
⍝ Simply apply the formula for cashflow calculations.
pv←{+/⍺÷×\1+⍵}
Problem 6 – Merge
∇ val←ns getval var
:If ''≡var ⍝ literal '@'
val←'@'
:ElseIf (⊂var)∊ns.⎕NL ¯2
val←⍕ns⍎var
:Else
val←'???'
:EndIf
∇
∇ text←templateFile Merge jsonFile;template;ns
template←⊃⎕NGET templateFile 1
ns←⎕JSON⊃⎕NGET jsonFile
⍝ We use a simple regex search and replace on the
⍝ template.
text←↑('@[a-zA-Z]*@'⎕R{ns getval ¯1↓1↓⍵.Match})template
∇
Problem 7 – UPC
CheckDigit←{10|-⍵+.×11⍴3 1}
⍝ Left and right representations of digits. Decoding
⍝ the binary representation from decimal is more
⍝ compact than writing everything explicitly.
lrepr←⍉(7⍴2)⊤13 25 19 61 35 49 47 59 55 11
rrepr←~¨lrepr
∇ bits←WriteUPC digits;left;right
:If (11=≢digits)∧∧/digits∊0,⍳9
left←,lrepr[1+6↑digits;]
right←,rrepr[1+6↓digits,CheckDigit digits;]
bits←1 0 1,left,0 1 0 1 0,right,1 0 1
:Else
bits←¯1
:EndIf
∇
∇ digits←ReadUPC bits
:If 95≠⍴bits ⍝ incorrect number of bits
digits←¯1
:Else
⍝ Test if the barcode was scanned right-to-left.
:If 0=2|+/bits[3+⍳7]
bits←⌽bits
:EndIf
digits←({¯1+lrepr⍳⍵}¨(7/⍳6)⊆42↑3↓bits),{¯1+rrepr⍳⍵}¨(7/⍳6)⊆¯42↑¯3↓bits
:If ~∧/digits∊0,⍳9 ⍝ incorrect parity
digits←¯1
:ElseIf (⊃⌽digits)≠CheckDigit ¯1↓digits ⍝ incorrect check digit
digits←¯1
:EndIf
:EndIf
∇
Problem 8 – Balancing the Scales
∇ parts←Balance nums;subsets;partitions
⍝ This is a brute force solution, running in
⍝ exponential time. We generate all the possible
⍝ partitions, filter out those which are not
⍝ balanced, and return the first matching one. There
⍝ are more advanced approach running in
⍝ pseudo-polynomial time (based on dynamic
⍝ programming, see the "Partition problem" Wikipedia
⍝ page), but they are not warranted here, as the
⍝ input size remains fairly small.
⍝ Generate all partitions of a vector of a given
⍝ size, as binary mask vectors.
subsets←{1↓2⊥⍣¯1⍳2*⍵}
⍝ Keep only the subsets whose sum is exactly
⍝ (+/nums)÷2.
partitions←nums{((2÷⍨+/⍺)=⍺+.×⍵)/⍵}subsets⍴nums
:If 0=≢,partitions
⍝ If no partition satisfy the above
⍝ criterion, we return ⍬.
parts←⍬
:Else
⍝ Otherwise, we return the first possible
⍝ partition.
parts←nums{((⊂,(⊂~))⊃↓⍉⍵)/¨2⍴⊂⍺}partitions
:EndIf
∇
Problem 9 – Upwardly Mobile
∇ weights←Weights filename;mobile;branches;mat
⍝ Put your code and comments below here
⍝ Parse the mobile input file.
mobile←↑⊃⎕NGET filename 1
branches←⍸mobile∊'┌┴┐'
⍝ TODO: Build the matrix of coefficients mat.
⍝ Solve the system of equations (arbitrarily setting
⍝ the first variable at 1 because the system is
⍝ overdetermined), then multiply the coefficients by
⍝ their least common multiple to get the smallest
⍝ integer weights.
weights←((1∘,)×(∧/÷))mat[;1]⌹1↓[2]mat
∇
:EndNamespace
:EndNamespace