Update post
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e23484669
commit
abb6bd0b90
7 changed files with 197 additions and 107 deletions
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: "Operations Research and Optimisation: where to start?"
|
||||
date: 2020-04-08
|
||||
date: 2020-05-26
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operations_research][Operations research]] (OR) is a vast area comprising a lot of theory,
|
||||
|
@ -23,18 +23,53 @@ scientist" standpoint.
|
|||
Operations research can be difficult to approach, since there are many
|
||||
references and subfields. Compared to machine learning for instance,
|
||||
OR has a slightly longer history (going back to the 17th century, for
|
||||
example with Monge and the optimal transport problem). This means that
|
||||
good textbooks and such have existed for a long time, but also that
|
||||
there will be plenty of material to choose from.
|
||||
example with [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspard_Monge][Monge]] and the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_theory_(mathematics)][optimal transport
|
||||
problem]])[fn:optimaltransport]. This means that good textbooks and such
|
||||
have existed for a long time, but also that there will be plenty of
|
||||
material to choose from.
|
||||
|
||||
[fn:optimaltransport] {-} For a very nice introduction (in French) to
|
||||
optimal transport, see these blog posts by [[https://twitter.com/gabrielpeyre][Gabriel Peyré]], on the CNRS
|
||||
maths blog: [[https://images.math.cnrs.fr/Le-transport-optimal-numerique-et-ses-applications-Partie-1.html][Part 1]] and [[https://images.math.cnrs.fr/Le-transport-optimal-numerique-et-ses-applications-Partie-2.html][Part 2]]. See also the resources on
|
||||
[[https://optimaltransport.github.io/][optimaltransport.github.io]] (in English).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, OR is very close to applications. Sometimes methods may vary
|
||||
a lot in their presentation depending on whether they're applied to
|
||||
train tracks, sudoku, or travelling salesmen. In practice, the
|
||||
terminology and notations are not the same everywhere. This is
|
||||
disconcerting if you are used to mathematics, where notations evolved
|
||||
over a long time and is pretty much standardised for many areas. In
|
||||
contrast, if you're used to the statistics literature with its [[https://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/10/13/whats-wrong-with-probability-notation/][strange
|
||||
notations]], you will find that OR is actually very well formalised.
|
||||
disconcerting if you are used to "pure" mathematics, where notations
|
||||
evolved over a long time and is pretty much standardised for many
|
||||
areas. In contrast, if you're used to the statistics literature with
|
||||
its [[https://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/10/13/whats-wrong-with-probability-notation/][strange notations]], you will find that OR is actually very well
|
||||
formalized.
|
||||
|
||||
There are many subfields of operations research, including all kinds
|
||||
of optimization (constrained and unconstrained), game theory, dynamic
|
||||
programming, stochastic processes, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
* Where to start
|
||||
|
||||
For an overall introduction, I recommend cite:wentzel1988_operat. It
|
||||
is an old book, published by Mir Publications, a Soviet publisher
|
||||
which published many excellent scientific textbooks[fn:mir]. It is out
|
||||
of print, but it is available [[https://archive.org/details/WentzelOperationsResearchMir1983][on Archive.org]]. The book is quite old,
|
||||
but everything presented is still extremely relevant today. It
|
||||
requires absolutely no background, and covers everything: a general
|
||||
introduction to the field, linear programming, dynamic programming,
|
||||
Markov processes and queues, Monte Carlo methods, and game
|
||||
theory. Even if you already know some of these topics, the
|
||||
presentations is so clear that it is a pleasure to read! (In
|
||||
particular, it is one of the best presentations of dynamic programming
|
||||
that I have ever read. The explanation of the simplex algorithm is
|
||||
also excellent.)
|
||||
|
||||
[fn:mir] {-} Mir also published [[https://mirtitles.org/2011/06/03/physics-for-everyone/][/Physics for Everyone/]] by Lev Landau
|
||||
and Alexander Kitaigorodsky, a three-volume introduction to physics
|
||||
that is really accessible. Together with Feynman's famous [[https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/][lectures]], I
|
||||
read them (in French) when I was a kid, and it was the best
|
||||
introduction I could possibly have to the subject.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- why it may be more difficult to approach than other, more recent
|
||||
areas like ML and DL
|
||||
|
@ -58,3 +93,5 @@ notations]], you will find that OR is actually very well formalised.
|
|||
- references
|
||||
- courses
|
||||
- computational assets
|
||||
|
||||
* References
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue